University internationalisation is no longer limited to offering English-taught programmes or partnerships with top-ranked institutions. It has evolved into a strategic, multifaceted activity shaped by local governance, global priorities, and an increasingly multipolar world.
Prof. Anthony Welch offered a detailed analysis of China’s higher education governance and its influence on internationalisation. Drawing from Confucian traditions, he explained how contemporary governance frameworks in China combine autonomy with strict government oversight. Despite challenges such as ideological control and corruption, China’s investments in research and its utilisation of its global diaspora have positioned it as a scientific powerhouse. However, geopolitical tensions — exemplified by the US-China trade war — have complicated collaborations, particularly in the West. Prof. Welch emphasised that balanced partnerships with China are essential for addressing shared global challenges.
Olga Krylova highlighted emerging trends in internationalisation, including comprehensive strategies that integrate teaching, research, and community engagement. She stressed the importance of aligning global aspirations with local contexts, showcasing examples such as India’s National Education Policy and regional frameworks like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Dr Krylova also explored digital internationalisation and the diversification of student recruitment as critical strategies to enhance global engagement while addressing regional needs.
We can highlight the following key challenges — funding constraints, geopolitical tensions, and talent retention remains significant obstacles. Innovative solutions — such as leveraging global grants, fostering alumni networks, and aligning strategies with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) — were presented as vital for resilience in an unpredictable world. In a rapidly evolving global landscape, universities must embrace nuanced, locally informed internationalisation strategies that balance pragmatism with ambition.
One take-home message:
Internationalisation is not just a metric; it is a bridge to meaningful global engagement and shared progress.